2010 Rookie Ratings

Easports is releasing their ratings as they are drafted. You can find them here:

http://maddennfl.easports.com/draftpicks.action

Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???

Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.

SoxNats09 wrote:

Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???

Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.

there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?

Ocho Cinco wrote:

Easports is releasing their ratings as they are drafted. You can find them here:

http://maddennfl.easports.com/draftpicks.action

here`s round 2...after the draft is finished we sgould have every rookie rating...

http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/04/25/madden-nfl-rookie-ratings-for-the-second-round.aspx

and laurinaitis will not be that bad 77

Andre Smith is a 79

SoxNats09 wrote:

Andre Smith is a 79

britton is 78 XD he was a second rounder

lawrence sidbury will suck though hes not even drafted

http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/04/26/pat-white-s-full-madden-nfl-10-ratings.aspx

pat white full rating

http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/04/26/madden-nfl-10-rookie-rating-superlatives.aspx

top rookies in all categories

SoxNats09 wrote:

Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???

Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.

no they arent, theyre rookies, even matt ryan was raw garbage in his first few games in the nfl. Theyre there to be sculpted and very rarely do you see immediate impact within the first game or two. Im glad the best rated rookie each year is like 85, its something EA actually gets right in the game.

Touchdown Jesus wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???

Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.

no they arent, theyre rookies, even matt ryan was raw garbage in his first few games in the nfl. Theyre there to be sculpted and very rarely do you see immediate impact within the first game or two. Im glad the best rated rookie each year is like 85, its something EA actually gets right in the game.

I know Ryan's first career pass was a long TD, and I'm not sure of the stats but I'll look it up later for his first few games.

And even then, they need to have better player progression if they're gonna rate rooks low.

frenchy wrote:

http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/04/26/pat-white-s-full-madden-nfl-10-ratings.aspx

pat white full rating

why even post this, its just as easy to look at 2nd round ratings....

Why would anyone take any ratings serious, a day after..

Ocho Cinco wrote:

frenchy wrote:

http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/04/26/pat-white-s-full-madden-nfl-10-ratings.aspx

pat white full rating

why even post this, its just as easy to look at 2nd round ratings....

FULL rating not only overall

Mr.Showtime wrote:

Why would anyone take any ratings serious, a day after..

cause they are gonna be exactly the same in madden 10

frenchy wrote:

Mr.Showtime wrote:

Why would anyone take any ratings serious, a day after..

cause they are gonna be exactly the same in madden 10

I find this funny that I was the one who A) found and B) posted this yet you are defending it for me.....

frenchy wrote:

Ocho Cinco wrote:

frenchy wrote:

http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/04/26/pat-white-s-full-madden-nfl-10-ratings.aspx

pat white full rating

why even post this, its just as easy to look at 2nd round ratings....

FULL rating not only overall

thanks I didnt notice that when I checked the site yesterday.....again why? How many people are really going to be driven away from him even if his arm strength is in the mid 80's if he is a game changer.

frenchy wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???

Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.

there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?

This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.

So does this mean we should put them in our HQ for these players?

link for page that contains Excel file with all rookies and their rankings:

http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/04/26/madden-nfl-10-full-rookie-ratings-file.aspx

AllMadden08 wrote:

frenchy wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???

Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.

there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?

This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.

Not only that, they're making it so that the Star players are actually that much more coveted. So say a randy moss will still have a rating around 97 or whatever so he'll stand out more. And they're making it harder to come by with players who excel in certain areas, especially in the speed category. Hence players that really are fast will stand out more like they do in real life. Basically they're trying to make it harder to come by superstars.

Ocho Cinco wrote:

AllMadden08 wrote:

frenchy wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???

Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.

there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?

This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.

Not only that, they're making it so that the Star players are actually that much more coveted. So say a randy moss will still have a rating around 97 or whatever so he'll stand out more. And they're making it harder to come by with players who excel in certain areas, especially in the speed category. Hence players that really are fast will stand out more like they do in real life. Basically they're trying to make it harder to come by superstars.

Wide Receiver Larry Fitzgerald
Wide Receiver Ted Ginn Jr.
Running Back Chris Johnson.


Good Game.

Desert Demon wrote:

Ocho Cinco wrote:

AllMadden08 wrote:

frenchy wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???

Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.

there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?

This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.

Not only that, they're making it so that the Star players are actually that much more coveted. So say a randy moss will still have a rating around 97 or whatever so he'll stand out more. And they're making it harder to come by with players who excel in certain areas, especially in the speed category. Hence players that really are fast will stand out more like they do in real life. Basically they're trying to make it harder to come by superstars.

Wide Receiver Larry Fitzgerald
Wide Receiver Ted Ginn Jr.
Running Back Chris Johnson.


Good Game.

your a good game

AllMadden08 wrote:

So does this mean we should put them in our HQ for these players?

i think we should