| | #2 overall pick |  |
|
+6greenway_4_sho Mr.Showtime SimsZilla daking5 Harper41 PatsNats09 10 posters |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
 | | Subject: #2 overall pick February 13th 2009, 11:29 pm | |
| I have the #2 pick, I'm looking to trade down. If I am not getting a top 10 pick back in any trade, I have to be getting a stud. My biggest needs are RG, ROLB, LOLB, although I'll listen to nearly anything. If I don't like the offers, I may just keep the pick seeing as I've got a couple players in mind I could take with it. | |
|
| | |
Harper41
Admin
Posts : 1244
Join date : 2008-10-03
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:51 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
daking5
Hatputs
Posts : 815
Join date : 2008-08-21
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 3:04 am | |
| MLB Nick Barnett 91, should be around 95 or higher at OLB | |
|
| | |
SimsZilla
Posts : 460
Join date : 2008-08-21
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 9:47 am | |
| I have the 7th pick or I might ahve the 13th pick.
7th is harder to get. 13th oucld move easily | |
|
| | |
Mr.Showtime
Posts : 950
Join date : 2008-10-03
Age : 33
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:29 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:35 pm | |
| - Harper41 wrote:
- Julian Peterson 95
Too old, sorry I'm not looking in that direction. | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:35 pm | |
| - daking5 wrote:
- MLB Nick Barnett 91, should be around 95 or higher at OLB
I've already got two pure MLBs, I kinda like Barnett... I'll entertain any offer. | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:37 pm | |
| - SimsZilla wrote:
- I have the 7th pick or I might ahve the 13th pick.
7th is harder to get. 13th oucld move easily What did you have in mind? BTW by the draft value chart, #2 (2600 pts) for #7 (1500 pts) and #13 (1150 pts) is a pretty fair trade... I could add like a 4th or something to make up the 50 pts. | |
|
| | |
Harper41
Admin
Posts : 1244
Join date : 2008-10-03
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:55 pm | |
| The draft value chart is stupid as hell. The #2 pick is not worth that. | |
|
| | |
greenway_4_sho
Posts : 424
Join date : 2008-08-14
Age : 30
Location : Superior, WI
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:55 pm | |
| - Harper41 wrote:
- The draft value chart is stupid as hell. The #2 pick is not worth that.
The draft value chart is accurate. | |
|
| | |
greenway_4_sho
Posts : 424
Join date : 2008-08-14
Age : 30
Location : Superior, WI
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:56 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:57 pm | |
| - BenDover wrote:
- I have my 1st btw.
What # is it? | |
|
| | |
Harper41
Admin
Posts : 1244
Join date : 2008-10-03
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 1:59 pm | |
| - BenDover wrote:
- Harper41 wrote:
- The draft value chart is stupid as hell. The #2 pick is not worth that.
The draft value chart is accurate. Who in their right mind would trade #7 and #13 for #2. | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 2:01 pm | |
| - Harper41 wrote:
- BenDover wrote:
- Harper41 wrote:
- The draft value chart is stupid as hell. The #2 pick is not worth that.
The draft value chart is accurate. Who in their right mind would trade #7 and #13 for #2. Withholding salary implications (which don't exist in this league), it's not a bad trade, because most top 5 picks outside of QB end up starting their rookie year, and if they are good, they can reach at least the high 80s the next year. The same could happen for the #7 pick, but #13 doesn't start a lot of the time. So his rating increase is slowed... | |
|
| | |
Harper41
Admin
Posts : 1244
Join date : 2008-10-03
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 2:11 pm | |
| Not really...A majority of the top 15 picks start, and if you draft a position that usually steps right into starting their isnt an issue. The point is 2 top 15 talents>1 top 5 talent but thats just my opinion. | |
|
| | |
Mavfatha
Posts : 201
Join date : 2009-02-07
Age : 34
Location : I am where I am
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 2:29 pm | |
| - Harper41 wrote:
- Not really...A majority of the top 15 picks start, and if you draft a position that usually steps right into starting their isnt an issue. The point is 2 top 15 talents>1 top 5 talent but thats just my opinion.
I agree with you, and also think the value chart thing overvalues certain picks. | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 2:40 pm | |
| Anyway, back on the main topic of the thread... | |
|
| | |
greenway_4_sho
Posts : 424
Join date : 2008-08-14
Age : 30
Location : Superior, WI
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 2:49 pm | |
| - SoxNats09 wrote:
- BenDover wrote:
- I have my 1st btw.
What # is it? #11. | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 3:07 pm | |
| - BenDover wrote:
- SoxNats09 wrote:
- BenDover wrote:
- I have my 1st btw.
What # is it?
#11. Close enough to the top 10, I'll take it... what else can you add? | |
|
| | |
daking5
Hatputs
Posts : 815
Join date : 2008-08-21
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 3:24 pm | |
| - Harper41 wrote:
- The draft value chart is stupid as hell. The #2 pick is not worth that.
agreed, it's just accurate for real life | |
|
| | |
daking5
Hatputs
Posts : 815
Join date : 2008-08-21
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 14th 2009, 3:24 pm | |
| - SoxNats09 wrote:
- daking5 wrote:
- MLB Nick Barnett 91, should be around 95 or higher at OLB
I've already got two pure MLBs, I kinda like Barnett... I'll entertain any offer. so what type of deal can we do? | |
|
| | |
greenway_4_sho
Posts : 424
Join date : 2008-08-14
Age : 30
Location : Superior, WI
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 15th 2009, 2:55 pm | |
| - SoxNats09 wrote:
- BenDover wrote:
- SoxNats09 wrote:
- BenDover wrote:
- I have my 1st btw.
What # is it?
#11.
Close enough to the top 10, I'll take it... what else can you add? What else would you want? | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 15th 2009, 3:01 pm | |
| Any way I could get Donte Whitner in a deal? I could add some more. | |
|
| | |
PatsNats09
Admin
Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 18th 2009, 10:06 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Harper41
Admin
Posts : 1244
Join date : 2008-10-03
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick February 18th 2009, 10:10 pm | |
| Im interested in it depending on how you value it. Ive got a mid round pick, its the Chargers, I believe its like 13-17 somewhere around their. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: #2 overall pick | |
| |
|
| | |
| | #2 overall pick | |
|
