FA Discussion

Harper41 wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Carlos Rogers is overrated, he should be ~87-88.

Okay, also you are in the NFC, so I don't care about you.

Overrated? Far from it. If anything hes underrated. He was the Redskins best CB by far and was one of the better CBs last year.

False. He isn't bad in technique, but he has hands of STONE. Trust me, Redskins are my second favorite team. I'd say Shawn Springs was the best CB when healthy, and then you could make a case for DeAngelo or Carlos. I prefer Carlos, but others would say DeAngelo.

SimsZilla wrote:

Desert Demon wrote:

SimsZilla wrote:

Desert Demon wrote:

SimsZilla wrote:

GOOO CALVIN JOHNSON

The only one worth mentioning on that team

Send him to me! I'll pay up!

muhuahahahah never. hes a lion fo life dawg

LT Gandy 94, QB Warner 95, 2nd, 3rd, whoever my #2 WR ends up being.

naw, i dotn need LT or QB. and im not trading him muahahahhaah
LT OTah
QB cassel

What u need dawg.

Desert Demon wrote:

SimsZilla wrote:

Desert Demon wrote:

SimsZilla wrote:

Desert Demon wrote:

SimsZilla wrote:

GOOO CALVIN JOHNSON

The only one worth mentioning on that team

Send him to me! I'll pay up!

muhuahahahah never. hes a lion fo life dawg

LT Gandy 94, QB Warner 95, 2nd, 3rd, whoever my #2 WR ends up being.

naw, i dotn need LT or QB. and im not trading him muahahahhaah
LT OTah
QB cassel

What u need dawg.

hopefully nothing after FA =)
im not trading CJ.

SoxNats09 wrote:

Harper41 wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Carlos Rogers is overrated, he should be ~87-88.

Okay, also you are in the NFC, so I don't care about you.

Overrated? Far from it. If anything hes underrated. He was the Redskins best CB by far and was one of the better CBs last year.

False. He isn't bad in technique, but he has hands of STONE. Trust me, Redskins are my second favorite team. I'd say Shawn Springs was the best CB when healthy, and then you could make a case for DeAngelo or Carlos. I prefer Carlos, but others would say DeAngelo.

INTs arent what make a CB...He locked down most WRs he faced, ill take a guy who doesnt let up more than a catch or two a game over a guy who gets beat for 4-5 catches but has great hands.

Harper41 wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Harper41 wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

Carlos Rogers is overrated, he should be ~87-88.

Okay, also you are in the NFC, so I don't care about you.

Overrated? Far from it. If anything hes underrated. He was the Redskins best CB by far and was one of the better CBs last year.

False. He isn't bad in technique, but he has hands of STONE. Trust me, Redskins are my second favorite team. I'd say Shawn Springs was the best CB when healthy, and then you could make a case for DeAngelo or Carlos. I prefer Carlos, but others would say DeAngelo.

INTs arent what make a CB...He locked down most WRs he faced, ill take a guy who doesnt let up more than a catch or two a game over a guy who gets beat for 4-5 catches but has great hands.

I know, which is why I'd take Carlos over DeAngelo. But you are wrong in that he didn't lock down most CBs he faced... he is good, but not lockdown. Don't make him out to be more than he is.

Im not, he was quite a good CB last season.

I thought there would be better free agents. I only see about 5 very good players...

Carlos Rogers allows more than 1 catch a game...

Guys, please don't talk in the FA threads. Just post it in here like "Elvis Dumervil is an 85 in the updates". Mainly because we look at last post for the time that a bid expires, your posts throw that off.

I considered bidding on DJ Williams, but I have many positions that I need to fill, and I didn't want to spend more than 75% of my points on one guy.

Also, does anyone know John DiGeorgio's updated rating? I doubt it is 84.

Earnest Graham. Steal of free agency

Harper41 wrote:

Earnest Graham. Steal of free agency

That gives you 98 points you've spent, which is 8 over what you actually have.

Dont worry about it, I wont lose anyone important.

You aren't close to having won him though MK

I'm deleting non-bidding posts that I find in FA threads. Nothing against the message, just don't post it in the FA threads.

Also, I really don't have many any needs for starters in FA, most of my points spent would be on backups, so I don't mind giving 99 for DJ.

Josh Bullocks is the worst safety in the league.

Showtime you can have Chambers, I found out he is an 86 so good luck with him at 58 points...

now let me get stylez g

Question.

In the UFA Rules, where it states the signing rules, (i.e. 3-10 pts = <3 years)

does the "<" mean:
-no greater than
or
-less than

(I'm a math major, so should it be changed to <? Or is it true the way it is written?)

AllMadden08 wrote:

Question.

In the UFA Rules, where it states the signing rules, (i.e. 3-10 pts = <3 years)

does the "<" mean:
-no greater than
or
-less than

(I'm a math major, so should it be changed to <? Or is it true the way it is written?)

Less than 3 years is correct. It's also ≤2 years.

So you can sign him to 1 year, or 2 years.

Why are people willing to pay up to and over 25 points for Tyler Thigpen? He's going to be a backup...

Desert Demon wrote:

Why are people willing to pay up to and over 25 points for Tyler Thigpen? He's going to be a backup...

Thats in 11 games. When a 7th round pick that was cut from the Vikings (which means he's horrible) starts and does this well, he gets a nice rating boost. I wouldn't be surprised if he was 83 OVR in 2010.