Browns Trade Block

QB:
Ken Dorsey 71 3 27

HB:
Michael Tuner 88 6 26
Darren Sproles 79 1 25
Jerome Harrison 77 2 25
Gary Russell 75 2 21

FB:
Jacob Tamme 79 3 23

WR:
Dwayne Bowe 90 4 23
Dallas Clark 90 6 29
Travis Wilson 71 2 24
Marcus Monk 68 2 22
Paul Hubbard 67 N/A 23

TE:
Bo Scaife 81 4 27
Martin Rucker 76 3 23

LG:
Junius Coston 82 3 24
Lennie Friedman 79 1 31

LT:
Joe Staley 86 4 24
Shane Olivea 81 4 26

C:
Hank Fraley 89 3 30
Dennis Norman 68 2 28

RT:
Kevin Shaffer 89 5 28
Ryan Tucker 84 3 33

RG:
Justin Blalock 77 3 25
Seth McKinney 77 1 29

LE:
Michael Strahan 94 1 36
Andre Coleman 62 1 24

DT:
Haloti Ngata 96 3 24
Shaun Rogers 94 6 29
Darrell Reid 78 2 26
Ahtyba Rubin 70 3 22

RE:
Justin Smith 89 6 28
Melila Purcell 68 2 24

LOLB:
Keith Rivers 82 5 22
Antwan Peek 78 2 28

MLB:
Nick Barnett 94 5 27
Beau Bell 69 3 22

ROLB:
Keith Brooking 89 2 32

CB:
Mike Jenkins 82 5 23
Daven Holly 78 1 26
Zackary Bowman 71 3 23
A.J. Davis 68 1 25
Jereme Perry 68 1 26

FS:
Michael Griffin 88 4 23
Mike Adams 75 1 27

SS:
Antoine Bathea 94 2 24
Steve Cargile 68 1 26

K:
Phil Dawson 91 2 33

P:
Dave Zastudil 81 3 29

who do you want for cribbs

Eagles like either of your top 2 DTs.

imevil wrote:

who do you want for cribbs

aw he's gone, forget to edit KR/PR

Harper41 wrote:

Eagles like either of your top 2 DTs.

patterson, white, jackson, andrews, herremans, abraham/cole, samuel, landry, first rounders

ladell betts for turner, ad anything you want

imevil wrote:

ladell betts for turner, ad anything you want

I'd take Bradshaw but not Betts

bradshaw for turner, that it, should i post it

imevil wrote:

bradshaw for turner, that it, should i post it

nah, I meant bradshaw as the replacement, u still have to add a good amount

daking5 wrote:

imevil wrote:

bradshaw for turner, that it, should i post it

nah, I meant bradshaw as the replacement, u still have to add a good amount

How bout this
Clark+Turner for Williams+Bradshaw
both trades together but you dont give a 3rd

imevil wrote:

daking5 wrote:

imevil wrote:

bradshaw for turner, that it, should i post it

nah, I meant bradshaw as the replacement, u still have to add a good amount

How bout this
Clark+Turner for Williams+Bradshaw
both trades together but you dont give a 3rd

no thanks

Marlin Jackson for Mike Jenkins + a 3rd?

daking5 wrote:

imevil wrote:

daking5 wrote:

imevil wrote:

bradshaw for turner, that it, should i post it

nah, I meant bradshaw as the replacement, u still have to add a good amount

How bout this
Clark+Turner for Williams+Bradshaw
both trades together but you dont give a 3rd

no thanks

then post the other trade, with the third

SoxNats08 wrote:

Marlin Jackson for Mike Jenkins + a 3rd?

no thanks, Jackson is injured and Jenkins is playing like a pro-bowler

imevil wrote:

daking5 wrote:

imevil wrote:

daking5 wrote:

imevil wrote:

bradshaw for turner, that it, should i post it

nah, I meant bradshaw as the replacement, u still have to add a good amount

How bout this
Clark+Turner for Williams+Bradshaw
both trades together but you dont give a 3rd

no thanks

then post the other trade, with the third

posted

agreed

daking5 wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

Marlin Jackson for Mike Jenkins + a 3rd?

no thanks, Jackson is injured and Jenkins is playing like a pro-bowler

LMFAO that is the most extreme over exageration ive ever seen, playing like a pro bowler? NOT even close.

Harper41 wrote:

daking5 wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

Marlin Jackson for Mike Jenkins + a 3rd?

no thanks, Jackson is injured and Jenkins is playing like a pro-bowler

LMFAO that is the most extreme over exageration ive ever seen, playing like a pro bowler? NOT even close.

meant in sim

SoxNats08 wrote:

Okay... You're comparing two different situations to favor yourself... In real life, Jackson has played better than Jenkins. In the sim, I'll get Jacksons' stats next week, but that's still an unfair comparison.

I know what you're saying but either way Jenkins is in a better situation ATM

Real Life:
Jenkins- is starting for cowboys
Jackson- is hurt

In Game:
Jenkins- is pro-bowl caliber
Jackson- IDK

just saying after all this is madden and I'm gonna take into account how they're doing in the game because that's what it all comes down to

Jenkins is starting because of injuries not because he overtook a better player...If Pacman wasnt done and Newman/Henry werent injured hed be a #4 CB...

And the game has nothing to do with next years game/ratings. The TC dosnt even take that into consideration.

Mr.Showtime wrote:

And the game has nothing to do with next years game/ratings. The TC dosnt even take that into consideration.

yea but they should, after all aren't we doing these trades to do good in the game not to have the top performers from real lige, I think this is clearly an overlooked factor

uh no...cuz they could suck in next years madden, your dumb

I was wondering if

Michael Tuner 88 6 26 or
Darren Sproles 79 1 25

i have Fred Taylor or Selvin Young as a replacment if you need one

Harper41 wrote:

uh no...cuz they could suck in next years madden, your dumb

I didn't say that should be the only factor but that should be factored, if u have a player who has a good rating, doing great in real life but horrible in sim that doesn't help at all