UFA Penalties

PatsNats09 · Admin Posts: 2673 Join date: 2008-08-21 Age: 16

no, the thing is the other bid was made before that. aka player b was won before player c. in MK's case, he was penalized, and there was still a pending bid after that.

_________________

Touchdown Jesus · Admin Posts: 2076 Join date: 2008-08-21

no there wasnt

_________________

PatsNats09 · Admin Posts: 2673 Join date: 2008-08-21 Age: 16

um wasn't the bid for trevor scott made after the bid for quin?

_________________

Harper41 · Admin Posts: 1244 Join date: 2008-10-04

Sox even if it was, I overbid on either one of them, wether I overbid on Quin or Scott doesn't make a difference. Its not like I bid 12 on Quin than went and bid 10 on Scott when I only had 10 points, I had 10 points and I bid 6 on each, one or the other put me over the max. Therefore I lose them and 10 points leaving me with 0. Jesus H Christ.

_________________

Touchdown Jesus · Admin Posts: 2076 Join date: 2008-08-21

PatsNats09 wrote:

um wasn't the bid for trevor scott made after the bid for quin?

no

Touchdown Jesus wrote:

he had 10 points left, had won scott for 6 points and then bid 6 on quin jr.

_________________

PatsNats09 · Admin Posts: 2673 Join date: 2008-08-21 Age: 16

Harper41 wrote:

Sox even if it was, I overbid on either one of them, wether I overbid on Quin or Scott doesn't make a difference. Its not like I bid 12 on Quin than went and bid 10 on Scott when I only had 10 points, I had 10 points and I bid 6 on each, one or the other put me over the max. Therefore I lose them and 10 points leaving me with 0. Jesus H Christ.

we're not really talking about your situation anymore, just discussing hypotheticals...

zoom, if that is true, then after the penalty wouldn't the bid on scott be nullified? he went over, he lost 10, so he'd be in negatives? you're only applying one penalty.

_________________

Touchdown Jesus · Admin Posts: 2076 Join date: 2008-08-21

Touchdown Jesus wrote:

it just means he wont get Quin or Trevor Scott

why you were saying he should be penalized ontop of the penalty is where all this controversy is stemming from

_________________

PatsNats09 · Admin Posts: 2673 Join date: 2008-08-21 Age: 16

i don't think i said you double penalize. it's like this:

let's say i have 30 pts. i've spent 28 on a bunch of guys. then i bid 3 on another guy. now i've gone 1 pt over, so i'm at 31. the penalty is -10, but i've already bid 28, so i'd be at -8. that's when you undo the signings backwards till u get below 20. but u don't penalize again.

_________________

Touchdown Jesus · Admin Posts: 2076 Join date: 2008-08-21

thats what we're doing in this case

PatsNats09 wrote:

does he have a pending bid on scott? because if that happens and he's at the limit, it's another 15 pt penalty.

thats what you said, and I tried to clarify and suggested we dont penalize someone twice in the scenario you were assuming

_________________

PatsNats09 · Admin Posts: 2673 Join date: 2008-08-21 Age: 16

Touchdown Jesus wrote:

thats what we're doing in this case

PatsNats09 wrote:

does he have a pending bid on scott? because if that happens and he's at the limit, it's another 15 pt penalty.

thats what you said, and I tried to clarify and suggested we dont penalize someone twice in the scenario you were assuming

i was sayin in MK's case, were he to go into negative points we'd reverse signings. i don't see me mentioning anywhere that you double penalize. any signings after the penalty are nullified.

_________________