Subject: Re: Official Cleveland Browns Trading Block September 16th 2009, 6:20 pm
Big_Z wrote:
Touchdown Jesus wrote:
Touchdown Jesus wrote:
Big_Z wrote:
yeah its not really that far off. i am gonna have to think this one over for a while. Is there any way we could do like davis and mcfadden for gaither, coffee and rice?
yea I can do this, wanna post?
are we doing this?
yeah go ahead and post it. i was considering a trade involving davis and aaron ross but i really need some help on my o-line
Subject: Re: Official Cleveland Browns Trading Block September 17th 2009, 3:32 pm
Harper41 wrote:
Ok well anyway I could just give someone of equal value up for Jenkins than? Hes a 76 in the most recent update BTW.
Yeah we could probably work something out. Depending on what goes down in my most recent offer to GOML in a trade including Pat Willis, I may be willing to move Malcom Jenkins in a trade that doesn't involve me getting a Corner in return.
I feel that the most fair and intriguing trade for me involving Jenkins for a one for one swap would be Jenkins for Percy Harvin. I need a WR really bad.
_________________
Harper41 wrote:
Really hes a fag? I didnt know that destroyed his value...Damn...I hope noone else on my team is gay.
Subject: Re: Official Cleveland Browns Trading Block September 17th 2009, 7:03 pm
Big_Z wrote:
Harper41 wrote:
Ok well anyway I could just give someone of equal value up for Jenkins than? Hes a 76 in the most recent update BTW.
Yeah we could probably work something out. Depending on what goes down in my most recent offer to GOML in a trade including Pat Willis, I may be willing to move Malcom Jenkins in a trade that doesn't involve me getting a Corner in return.
I feel that the most fair and intriguing trade for me involving Jenkins for a one for one swap would be Jenkins for Percy Harvin. I need a WR really bad.
I like Harvin a lot more than Jenkins though...Hes heavily involved in the Vikings offense while Jenkins is a #4 CB ATM in New Orleans. Ill think about it but is their anything else you have in mind?