80's that must go - no replacement needed

Players:
Reggie Kelly 80 - 1 - 32
Bertrand Berry 88 - 2 - 34
Jay Ratliff 88 - 4 - 27
Takeo Spikes 85 - 4 - 31

Draft Picks:
1st round pick (MIN) #27

they are available without the need of a replacement of any sort, my needs are currently:
WR (slot)
CB (replacement is jennings 84/26)
CB (nickle)
LOLB (no replacement)
FS (replacement is mikell 89/28)
RG (replacement is spitz 87/25) *might not be a need for long
TE (replacement is graham 85/30)
Contract Points

i like spikes

Bengals like Ratliff and Spikes a little

SimsZilla wrote:

i like spikes

what can I add with Spikes and Jennings to get Terrence McGee
what can I add with Spikes to get Cedric Griffin

I also like:
Jason Hanson 91 2 39
Drew Stanton 74 2 25

I want Ratliff back

Nate Burleson 83 WR for you as a slot WR
Rod Hood 87 at CB for you (I'd want Jennings back)

SoxNats09 wrote:

I want Ratliff back

Nate Burleson 83 WR for you as a slot WR
Rod Hood 87 at CB for you (I'd want Jennings back)

Interested in Burleson but I need a couple CPs in a deal with him
Like Hood too but I like McFadden more

I can do:
Jay Ratliff 88/27 + Quintin Mikell 89/28 for Michael Griffin 94/24 *Mikell is a SS, so that would solve your problem of having 2 FS'
Jay Ratliff 88/27 + Takeo Spikes 85/32 for Terrell Suggs 90/26
Jay Ratliff 88/27 + Kelly Jennings 84/26 for Bryant McFadden 86/27 + Steve Breaston 85/25

Those three offers were off the top of my head, these are the players I like:

Colt Brennan 73/26/2
Steve Breaston 85/25/2
Nate Burleson 83/27/1
Terrell Suggs 90/3/26
Roderick Hood 87/27/3
Bryant McFadden 86/27/2
Michael Griffin 94/24/3
Tom Zbikowski 74/24/2
Sam Koch 89/27/2

Touchdown Jesus wrote:

SoxNats09 wrote:

I want Ratliff back

Nate Burleson 83 WR for you as a slot WR
Rod Hood 87 at CB for you (I'd want Jennings back)

Interested in Burleson but I need a couple CPs in a deal with him
Like Hood too but I like McFadden more

I can do:
Jay Ratliff 88/27 + Quintin Mikell 89/28 for Michael Griffin 94/24 *Mikell is a SS, so that would solve your problem of having 2 FS'
Jay Ratliff 88/27 + Takeo Spikes 85/32 for Terrell Suggs 90/26
Jay Ratliff 88/27 + Kelly Jennings 84/26 for Bryant McFadden 86/27 + Steve Breaston 85/25

Those three offers were off the top of my head, these are the players I like:

Colt Brennan 73/26/2
Steve Breaston 85/25/2
Nate Burleson 83/27/1
Terrell Suggs 90/3/26
Roderick Hood 87/27/3
Bryant McFadden 86/27/2
Michael Griffin 94/24/3
Tom Zbikowski 74/24/2
Sam Koch 89/27/2

How many CPs do you need for Burleson?

I'm not really into those offers too much, I like the 3rd one the most though.

I guess I can do McFadden as well.

Brennan, Burleson, Zbikowski are avail w/o a replacement needed. Breaston, Suggs, Hood/McFadden, Griffin, and Koch require replacements that I like (Jennings works for the CBs).

Looking at your replacements, I don't like your WR replacement, I can deal Suggs if I'm getting one of your OLBs. Mikell is listed as an FS on your DC, did you move him? Don't wanna swap punters cuz Feagles is too old.

yes I moved him, hes an SS, Dawkins was the eagles FS this year.

I value Dansby and Sims > Suggs so that would need to be factored in

for curiousity sake why do you need a replacement for Breaston when you have Burleson

Okay, I like Mikell.

I value Dansby as > Suggs, but I think Suggs > Sims. They play in different systems, so it's tough to judge statistically, but Suggs is a premiere 3-4 OLB and Sims is a very good LB, but he did struggle this year. Granted, the Lions did go 0-16, but even then Sims is not a top 10 4-3 LB in the league.

And I might be dealing one of my +90 WRs in a deal, so Breaston becomes my #2 WR.

yea we have differing opinions of Sims then, IMO he struggled because the team struggled, the lions defense was basically Sims, a CB playing in the wrong scheme, and 9 tackling dummies. I dont value Sims >>> Suggs, but I do think he's better. What if anything would you require added to the first offer

The first offer is interesting, and I think it's pretty fair, but IMO Mikell got overrated in the updates (he shouldn't be higher than 86, especially now w/o Dawkins). I end up getting two solid players for a stud, and I'm not really interested. I can do McFadden 86 + Burleson 83 + CP for Ratliff 88 + Jennings 84.

not too interested in that seeing as Ratliff > McFadden and Jennings holds close to the same value as Burleson seeing as they are both in the same position this offseason

Okay I can add something to make up for the difference between Ratliff and McFadden. But it's not a big difference...

a 3rd would suffice, but id really prefer trying to work out something for Griffin as id probably wind up wanting to upgrade McFadden when all is said and done

What about a 4th?