Madden 10 League
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.



 
HomeLatest imagesSearchRegisterLog in

Madden 10 League :: League Archives :: 2009 Resignings Archives
 

 Denver Broncos re-signings

Go down 
5 posters
AuthorMessage
Harper41
Admin
Harper41


Posts : 1244
Join date : 2008-10-03

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 5th 2009, 12:33 am
WR Lee Evans 91 27
2 year deal=10.84
FS John Lynch 92 34
1 year deal= 5.712
WR Darrel Jackson 87 29
1 year deal= 5.13
SS Marlon Mcree 83 31
1 year deal= 1.7

Points used= 23.38

WR Samie Parker 74- FREE 2 year deal
OG Dylan Gandy 76- FREE 3 year deal
MLB Jordan Beck 70- FREE 1 year deal
K Matt Prater 70- FREE 3 year deal

Releasing
CB Dominique Foxworth - 78 - 1
FS Hamzuh Abdullah - 79 - 1
LOLB Nate Webster - 81 - 1
DE Elvis Dumervil - 90 - 1
DE Ebenezer Ekuban - 82 - 1
RT Erik Pears - 79 - 1
RT Chris Kuper - 79 - 1
C Tom Nalen - 89 - 1
HB Selvin Young - 84 - 1
FB Mike Bell - 78 - 1
QB Patrick Ramsey - 79 - 1
Back to top Go down
Desert Demon

Desert Demon


Posts : 470
Join date : 2008-08-21

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 8:07 pm
Go Figured that MK would be the dumbfuck to resign Lynch who retired in 2008.
Back to top Go down
Boss

Boss


Posts : 23
Join date : 2009-03-18

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 8:11 pm
I want this redone, I think it can possibly be a big fix, What an idiot.
Back to top Go down
Boss

Boss


Posts : 23
Join date : 2009-03-18

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 8:44 pm
Denver Broncos re-signings Pitchfork

This will go up Somebody's butt.


Last edited by Boss on March 18th 2009, 8:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
PatsNats09
Admin
PatsNats09


Posts : 2674
Join date : 2008-08-20
Age : 30

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 8:44 pm
Laughing
Back to top Go down
Boss

Boss


Posts : 23
Join date : 2009-03-18

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 9:08 pm
I want to shove a pitchfork up his buttock
Back to top Go down
Desert Demon

Desert Demon


Posts : 470
Join date : 2008-08-21

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 9:16 pm
Boss wrote:
I want to shove a pitchfork up his buttock

Laughing

MK is a douche that devalues other people's players, overvalues his, and only does trades that he rapes in.

And as you can see, he could give two shits about other teams. Everyone and their mama knew Lynch was gone, but MK is too retarded to realize it.
Back to top Go down
Ocho Cinco
Hatputs
Ocho Cinco


Posts : 817
Join date : 2008-09-17
Age : 34
Location : Why The HELL am I in Cleveland

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 9:24 pm
Desert Demon wrote:
Boss wrote:
I want to shove a pitchfork up his buttock

Laughing

MK is a douche that devalues other people's players, overvalues his, and only does trades that he rapes in.

And as you can see, he could give two shits about other teams. Everyone and their mama knew Lynch was gone, but MK is too retarded to realize it.

Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top Go down
Boss

Boss


Posts : 23
Join date : 2009-03-18

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 10:08 pm
Would it be fair if I redid this?
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 18th 2009, 11:52 pm
Take it easy dude, Harper just messed up. It's not like Dumervil is that good anyway Razz
Back to top Go down
Boss

Boss


Posts : 23
Join date : 2009-03-18

Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings EmptyMarch 19th 2009, 12:41 am
He will be.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
PostSubject: Re: Denver Broncos re-signings   Denver Broncos re-signings Empty
Back to top Go down
 
Denver Broncos re-signings
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Denver at Browns
» Denver Broncos Block
» The Denver Broncos Big Block
» Auto-Signings
» Panthers Signings

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Madden 10 League :: League Archives :: 2009 Resignings Archives-
Jump to: