why even post this, its just as easy to look at 2nd round ratings....
FULL rating not only overall
thanks I didnt notice that when I checked the site yesterday.....again why? How many people are really going to be driven away from him even if his arm strength is in the mid 80's if he is a game changer.
_________________
It has recently been discovered that one thing that may keep Vampire Cheetahs at bay is Stake Wielding Iron Garlic Monsters.
Posts: 817 Join date: 2008-09-18 Age: 19 Location: Why The HELL am I in Cleveland
Subject: Re: 2010 Rookie Ratings April 27th 2009, 12:43 am
AllMadden08 wrote:
frenchy wrote:
SoxNats09 wrote:
Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???
Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.
there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?
This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.
Not only that, they're making it so that the Star players are actually that much more coveted. So say a randy moss will still have a rating around 97 or whatever so he'll stand out more. And they're making it harder to come by with players who excel in certain areas, especially in the speed category. Hence players that really are fast will stand out more like they do in real life. Basically they're trying to make it harder to come by superstars.
_________________
It has recently been discovered that one thing that may keep Vampire Cheetahs at bay is Stake Wielding Iron Garlic Monsters.
Subject: Re: 2010 Rookie Ratings April 27th 2009, 1:01 am
Ocho Cinco wrote:
AllMadden08 wrote:
frenchy wrote:
SoxNats09 wrote:
Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???
Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.
there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?
This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.
Not only that, they're making it so that the Star players are actually that much more coveted. So say a randy moss will still have a rating around 97 or whatever so he'll stand out more. And they're making it harder to come by with players who excel in certain areas, especially in the speed category. Hence players that really are fast will stand out more like they do in real life. Basically they're trying to make it harder to come by superstars.
Wide Receiver Larry Fitzgerald Wide Receiver Ted Ginn Jr. Running Back Chris Johnson.
Posts: 817 Join date: 2008-09-18 Age: 19 Location: Why The HELL am I in Cleveland
Subject: Re: 2010 Rookie Ratings April 27th 2009, 1:26 am
Desert Demon wrote:
Ocho Cinco wrote:
AllMadden08 wrote:
frenchy wrote:
SoxNats09 wrote:
Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???
Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.
there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?
This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.
Not only that, they're making it so that the Star players are actually that much more coveted. So say a randy moss will still have a rating around 97 or whatever so he'll stand out more. And they're making it harder to come by with players who excel in certain areas, especially in the speed category. Hence players that really are fast will stand out more like they do in real life. Basically they're trying to make it harder to come by superstars.
Wide Receiver Larry Fitzgerald Wide Receiver Ted Ginn Jr. Running Back Chris Johnson.
Good Game.
your a good game
_________________
It has recently been discovered that one thing that may keep Vampire Cheetahs at bay is Stake Wielding Iron Garlic Monsters.
Subject: Re: 2010 Rookie Ratings April 27th 2009, 6:33 pm
Ocho Cinco wrote:
Desert Demon wrote:
Ocho Cinco wrote:
AllMadden08 wrote:
frenchy wrote:
SoxNats09 wrote:
Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???
Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.
there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?
This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.
Not only that, they're making it so that the Star players are actually that much more coveted. So say a randy moss will still have a rating around 97 or whatever so he'll stand out more. And they're making it harder to come by with players who excel in certain areas, especially in the speed category. Hence players that really are fast will stand out more like they do in real life. Basically they're trying to make it harder to come by superstars.
Wide Receiver Larry Fitzgerald Wide Receiver Ted Ginn Jr. Running Back Chris Johnson.
Posts: 817 Join date: 2008-09-18 Age: 19 Location: Why The HELL am I in Cleveland
Subject: Re: 2010 Rookie Ratings April 27th 2009, 6:47 pm
Steve Smith #12 wrote:
Ocho Cinco wrote:
Desert Demon wrote:
Ocho Cinco wrote:
AllMadden08 wrote:
frenchy wrote:
SoxNats09 wrote:
Wow those are rough - Freeman a 71???
Madden is WAY too tough on the rookies nowadays.
there is a new scale of ratings...so everybody is gonna have a lower rating...could you reely see pat white getting a 61 rating?
This is correct. EA is scaling back the rating system so that your average 2nd stringer is in the mid 70's or so, not up in the 80's.
Not only that, they're making it so that the Star players are actually that much more coveted. So say a randy moss will still have a rating around 97 or whatever so he'll stand out more. And they're making it harder to come by with players who excel in certain areas, especially in the speed category. Hence players that really are fast will stand out more like they do in real life. Basically they're trying to make it harder to come by superstars.
Wide Receiver Larry Fitzgerald Wide Receiver Ted Ginn Jr. Running Back Chris Johnson.
Good Game.
your a good game
His a good game what?
Don't think about it for to long. It might hurt me.
_________________
It has recently been discovered that one thing that may keep Vampire Cheetahs at bay is Stake Wielding Iron Garlic Monsters.
Subject: Re: 2010 Rookie Ratings April 28th 2009, 7:32 am
Ocho Cinco wrote:
Steve Smith #12 wrote:
Ocho Cinco wrote:
your a good game
His a good game what?
Don't think about it for to long. It might hurt me.
I'm fairly sure you are the one who does not get it.
"Your" shows possession. So you as saying that it is his "a good game".
"You're" is a contraction of "You" and "Are", in which case you'd have achieved what you actually meant, "You are a good game." While the joke is still lame, at least you would have projected what you actually meant.
Posts: 817 Join date: 2008-09-18 Age: 19 Location: Why The HELL am I in Cleveland
Subject: Re: 2010 Rookie Ratings April 28th 2009, 3:39 pm
Steve Smith #12 wrote:
Ocho Cinco wrote:
Steve Smith #12 wrote:
Ocho Cinco wrote:
your a good game
His a good game what?
Don't think about it for to long. It might hurt me.
I'm fairly sure you are the one who does not get it.
"Your" shows possession. So you as saying that it is his "a good game".
"You're" is a contraction of "You" and "Are", in which case you'd have achieved what you actually meant, "You are a good game." While the joke is still lame, at least you would have projected what you actually meant.
Demand a higher education!
Demand one when I go to one of the Best Private colleges in the nation? And I should really be that concerned about how I type on a website that has no relevance to real life. Ya that'll happen.
_________________
It has recently been discovered that one thing that may keep Vampire Cheetahs at bay is Stake Wielding Iron Garlic Monsters.
